A “contract” is therefore the basis of the partnership. However, it can be either explicit or tacit. Here too, it can be oral or written (Laxmibai vs. Roshan Lai). The word partnership itself is to separate and it means division. Sharing profits between two or more members is a prerequisite for a full-time partnership. It was decided that any man who has gained from the activity of the partnership must share the same with the other partners. In 1860, when there were no legal acts relating to the management of partnership rules, profit sharing was considered the most important test for determining the validity of a partnership, which was also decided in Cox vs. Hickman (3). The fifth component of a partnership stipulates that the activity must be managed by each of the partners or by one (at least one) of them, all of whom represents, i.e. there must be a mutual agency.
In this way, each partner is agent and client for itself and for different partners, for example, it can link to its demonstrations different partners and can be linked to the illustrations of different partners in the context of standard activities. The rules for winding up a partner`s departure due to the death or withdrawal of the transaction should also be included in the agreement. These conditions could include a purchase and sale agreement detailing the valuation process or require each partner to purchase life insurance that designates other partners as beneficiaries. If the goal is to do work of general interest, it will not be a partnership. When a certain number of people agree to share the income of a property or to share the goods purchased in large quantities, there is no partnership and these people cannot be called partners because they do not export a business under any circumstances. The partnership is the result of a contract. It does not arise from a status, a right or an inheritance right. Thus, after the death of the father, who was a partner in a business, the son can claim shares in the ownership of the company, but can only become a partner if he enters into a contract with other persons concerned. The question now is how many people the partnership can be effective. It is obvious that there can be no partnership with a single person or partner, because it would leave no connection between people.  There must therefore be at least two people for a partnership.
The Hon`ble Supreme Court has determined that the name of the company is only a compendive method of describing only the partners.  The important test of partnership is the existence of mutual representation between partners.  The material element would therefore be the authority of a partner to act for the whole and engage it through its actions.  Your agreement must determine how much each partner pays for its efforts.